<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Abandoned Mineral Lands on ErrorZap</title><link>https://errorzap.com/tags/abandoned-mineral-lands/</link><description>Recent content in Abandoned Mineral Lands on ErrorZap</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-US</language><copyright>ErrorZap</copyright><lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2026 03:00:00 -0600</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://errorzap.com/tags/abandoned-mineral-lands/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Grand Canyon's mine inventory: 38 sites, 75 features, by the numbers</title><link>https://errorzap.com/grand-canyon/mine-inventory/</link><pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2026 03:00:00 -0600</pubDate><guid>https://errorzap.com/grand-canyon/mine-inventory/</guid><description>NPS has counted 75 abandoned mine features across 38 sites in the park, part of a 37,050-feature nationwide problem. Here&amp;#39;s the public accounting.</description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="ez-dossier-lede"><span>GRAND CANYON · MINES · TOPIC 34</span><p>Grand Canyon National Park doesn't advertise a number, but the National Park Service has one anyway: 38 documented sites, 75 individual mine features, scattered across a park most visitors think of as scenery, not industrial history. Nobody's mapping them for you — this is what the public record says about how many there are and what the park is doing about it.</p></div>
<h2 id="the-short-version">The short version</h2>
<ul>
<li>NPS has formally documented 38 Abandoned Mineral Lands (AML) sites containing 75 individual features — adits, shafts, pits, tunnels, prospects, tailings piles — inside Grand Canyon National Park.</li>
<li>Twelve of those 38 sites are flagged by NPS as requiring active mitigation.</li>
<li>Grand Canyon is one small piece of a much bigger federal problem: a 2010-2013 nationwide NPS inventory found 37,050 abandoned mine and oil-and-gas-well features across 133 national park units.</li>
<li>The park&rsquo;s Superintendent&rsquo;s Compendium defines &ldquo;mine&rdquo; broadly and closes all of them, park-wide, to public access without special written permission — on top of separate, named closures at specific sites.</li>
<li>A 2009 ARRA-funded push closed dozens of hardrock features across nine Intermountain Region parks, including Grand Canyon, using bat-gates, grates, backfilling, and fencing.</li>
<li>No public source found this session breaks the 75 Grand Canyon features down by exact type, or gives a current per-park tally of how many have actually been closed.</li>
</ul>
<h2 id="why-there-are-so-many-holes-in-a-national-park">Why there are so many holes in a national park</h2>
<p>Grand Canyon&rsquo;s mining history runs from an 1880s copper-and-asbestos prospecting boom through a uranium rush that didn&rsquo;t wind down until the mid-1980s. Copper, lead, and asbestos were pulled out in relatively small quantities almost from the start. The serious money was uranium, concentrated in a distinctive local geologic feature called a solution-collapse breccia pipe — a vertical column formed where ancient cave systems in the Redwall Limestone collapsed under overlying rock, later filled with metal-bearing groundwater. Breccia pipes are unusual worldwide but abundant across northern Arizona and southern Utah, and often carry both uranium and copper together, plus the occasional mineral found nowhere else — grandviewite, named for the Grand View Mine, is known only from Grand Canyon.</p>
<p>Most of these operations were small and financially marginal, echoing the Bass and Hance mining histories elsewhere on this site. But &ldquo;marginal&rdquo; doesn&rsquo;t mean &ldquo;gone.&rdquo; Every adit, shaft, pit, tunnel, prospect, and tailings pile anyone dug still exists somewhere in the canyon, decades or a century after the miners walked away.</p>
<h2 id="counting-the-holes-38-sites-75-features">Counting the holes: 38 sites, 75 features</h2>
<p>The park&rsquo;s own current figure, published on the NPS Geodiversity Atlas, is specific: 38 documented Abandoned Mineral Lands sites, containing 75 individual features, inside Grand Canyon National Park. Twelve of those sites require active mitigation, per the same source.</p>
<p>That&rsquo;s the Grand Canyon slice of a much larger federal accounting problem. Between 2010 and 2013, NPS ran its first comprehensive, boots-on-the-ground inventory of abandoned mineral lands across the entire park system, and came back with 37,050 individual abandoned mine and oil-and-gas-well features spread across 133 national park units nationwide. Of that total, roughly 1,800 features had already received long-term remedial action, another 3,800 or so across 76 parks still needed it, and the remaining bulk — over 31,000 — were catalogued for site characterization but required no action. Grand Canyon&rsquo;s 75 features are a small fraction of that count, but the park is one of the more heavily mined units in the system, given the copper-asbestos-uranium sequence above.</p>
<p>What the public record doesn&rsquo;t offer, at least in anything found this session, is a type-by-type breakdown of those 75 Grand Canyon features — how many are open shafts versus sealed adits versus surface prospects versus tailings piles. The technical report that almost certainly has that level of detail, Burghardt, Norby, and Pranger&rsquo;s 2014 NPS comprehensive inventory and assessment, is cited by name on the Geodiversity Atlas page but wasn&rsquo;t independently opened this session.</p>
<table>
	<thead>
			<tr>
					<th>Figure</th>
					<th>Scope</th>
					<th>Source</th>
			</tr>
	</thead>
	<tbody>
			<tr>
					<td>38 sites / 75 features, 12 requiring mitigation</td>
					<td>Grand Canyon National Park specifically</td>
					<td>NPS Geodiversity Atlas (updated July 2024)</td>
			</tr>
			<tr>
					<td>37,050 features</td>
					<td>133 national park units nationwide, 2010-2013 inventory</td>
					<td>NPS Park Science journal</td>
			</tr>
			<tr>
					<td>~1,800 features already remediated</td>
					<td>Nationwide</td>
					<td>NPS Park Science journal</td>
			</tr>
			<tr>
					<td>~3,800 features still needing remedial action, in 76 parks</td>
					<td>Nationwide</td>
					<td>NPS Park Science journal</td>
			</tr>
			<tr>
					<td>144 hardrock features fenced/signed</td>
					<td>Saguaro National Park, 2009 ARRA funding</td>
					<td>NPS Intermountain Region summary</td>
			</tr>
			<tr>
					<td>85 hardrock features permanently closed</td>
					<td>Nine Intermountain Region parks combined, incl. Grand Canyon, 2009 ARRA funding</td>
					<td>NPS Intermountain Region summary</td>
			</tr>
	</tbody>
</table>
<figure class="gc-cartoon">
  <img src="cartoon-bat-gate.webp" alt="Comic panel of a mine adit sealed with a bat-friendly horizontal-bar gate, with bats flying freely through the bars while a hiker outside looks at the gate" loading="lazy">
  <figcaption>Bat-gates let wildlife through and keep people out.</figcaption>
</figure>
<h2 id="what-closing-a-mine-actually-looks-like">What closing a mine actually looks like</h2>
<p>The park doesn&rsquo;t have one universal fix for a hazardous mine opening. The standard toolkit, used region-wide and applicable at Grand Canyon, includes bat-accessible gates and cupolas over adits (horizontal bars spaced wide enough for bats to fly through but too narrow for a person), grates over vertical shafts, fencing, and backfilling. Backfilling isn&rsquo;t as simple as dumping fill down a hole — where a feature is closed that way, staff document it photographically first, and fill typically stops within three feet of the surface on one side to leave a wildlife ramp rather than sealing the opening flush.</p>
<p>Money for this work has come in uneven pulses. The largest push came in 2009, funded through the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act: $5,006,000 region-wide to fence and sign 144 hardrock features at Saguaro alone and build long-term closures at 85 hardrock features spread across nine Intermountain Region parks together — Black Canyon of the Gunnison, Chiricahua, Coronado, Fort Bowie, Glacier, Glen Canyon, Grand Canyon, Organ Pipe Cactus, and Saguaro — plus reclaiming 13 gravel pits at Great Sand Dunes. That same year, Bat Conservation International separately funded a single $40,000 bat-gate at one adit in Grand Canyon. Neither region-wide total is broken out to show exactly how many closures landed inside Grand Canyon specifically, one of the real gaps in the public record here.</p>
<p>Also in 2009, NPS opened public scoping on an Environmental Assessment to close hazardous mine openings jointly across four parks — Coronado National Memorial, Grand Canyon, Organ Pipe Cactus, and Saguaro — with the same toolkit on the table. NPS&rsquo;s own framing of the hazards is blunt: falling into shafts, loose rock falling from adit roofs, high radon concentrations, toxic metals, and asbestos inhalation. It also flags something easy to miss: some mine features sit in areas with wilderness character, some serve as important wildlife habitat (bats especially), and some are eligible for the National Register of Historic Places. A hole in the ground can be a hazard, a historic structure, and a bat colony&rsquo;s home, all three at once — why &ldquo;just fill it in&rdquo; isn&rsquo;t always the answer.</p>
<figure class="gc-cartoon">
  <img src="cartoon-spectrometer.webp" alt="Comic panel of two researchers using a handheld gamma-ray spectrometer over a waste rock pile at an old mine site while a chart nearby spikes dramatically" loading="lazy">
  <figcaption>A 2003 study found waste rock up to 125 times background radiation levels.</figcaption>
</figure>
<h2 id="one-mine-studied-up-close">One mine, studied up close</h2>
<p>The 38-and-75 figures are useful, but they&rsquo;re abstractions. A 2003 peer-reviewed NPS Park Science study of the historic Grand View Mine — a copper claim staked by prospector Pete Berry in April 1890 along the still-maintained Grand View Trail, acquired by NPS in 1939 — shows what &ldquo;AML mitigation&rdquo; actually involves on the ground. Researchers from Fort Lewis College and New Mexico Highlands University used a portable gamma-ray spectrometer to measure radioactivity in the mine&rsquo;s waste rock and found levels up to 125 times the local background reading, with the Grand View Trail itself crossing directly over some of the hottest waste-rock piles.</p>
<p>Their recommendations weren&rsquo;t dramatic: reroute a short trail segment around the worst waste rock, post warning signs, distribute better information to backpackers. As of that 2003 study, the mine&rsquo;s shafts, entrances, and adits were still open and accessible, and staff relied mainly on backcountry-permit paperwork rather than on-site signage. It&rsquo;s a small-scale illustration of the same triage happening, in theory, at all 75 documented features: figure out which are genuinely dangerous, and pick a fix that doesn&rsquo;t erase the history along with the hazard.</p>
<h2 id="whats-actually-off-limits-and-why">What&rsquo;s actually off-limits (and why)</h2>
<p>The park&rsquo;s Superintendent&rsquo;s Compendium handles this at two levels. First, a blanket rule: it defines &ldquo;mine&rdquo; for management purposes as any anthropogenic feature excavated for mineral extraction — adits, shafts, pits, tunnels, prospects, and tailings piles all count — and then closes public presence, use, and access in every mine meeting that definition, park-wide, without special written permission from the superintendent. The stated reasons are protecting human health and safety, unrecorded archaeological features, and wildlife habitat.</p>
<p>On top of that general rule, the compendium names several closures by site: the <a href="/grand-canyon/bass-asbestos-mine/">Bass Asbestos Mine</a> in Hakatai Canyon (a 500-foot buffer, listed twice), the <a href="/grand-canyon/orphan-mine/">Orphan Mine</a>&rsquo;s upper and lower sites (fully fenced), and the <a href="/grand-canyon/hance-mine/">Hance Mine</a> (a hard river-corridor closure, Mile 77.5 through 78.6). The compendium also closes the Hopi Salt Mines, a traditional Hopi cultural site along the river — a different kind of place entirely, a sacred salt-gathering location the tribe itself describes, not a hardrock mineral claim, and excluded from the industrial-mining count above out of respect for how the Hopi define its significance.</p>
<p>Beyond those named sites, the other roughly seventy documented features scattered across the park don&rsquo;t get individual write-ups in the compendium — they fall under the general &ldquo;all mines&rdquo; rule instead. For a fuller rundown of what&rsquo;s closed park-wide and why, see the <a href="/grand-canyon/what-is-off-limits/">general off-limits overview</a>.</p>
<h2 id="sources">Sources</h2>
<ol class="ez-sources"><li><a href="https://www.nps.gov/articles/nps-geodiversity-atlas-grand-canyon-national-park-arizona.htm">NPS Geodiversity Atlas — Grand Canyon National Park, Arizona — National Park Service</a></li><li><a href="https://home.nps.gov/articles/parkscience_32_1_55_dansby_3822.htm">Abandoned mineral lands — NPS Park Science journal — National Park Service</a></li><li><a href="https://www.nps.gov/subjects/abandonedminerallands/intermountain-region-summary.htm">Intermountain Region Summary — Abandoned Mineral Lands — National Park Service</a></li><li><a href="https://parkplanning.nps.gov/showFile.cfm?sfid=65833&projectID=24740">Abandoned Mine Lands Closure Plan, Project Scoping Newsletter (August 10, 2009) — National Park Service</a></li><li><a href="https://irma.nps.gov/DataStore/DownloadFile/615734">The Legacy of the Grand View Mine, Park Science Vol. 22 No. 1 (Fall 2003) — National Park Service</a></li><li><a href="https://www.nps.gov/grca/learn/management/upload/grca-supt-compendium.pdf">Grand Canyon National Park Superintendent's Compendium, effective June 16, 2026 — National Park Service</a></li></ol>
]]></content:encoded></item></channel></rss>