Pinyon Plain Mine (formerly Canyon Mine) sat idle for decades on Kaibab National Forest just south of the park. Ore hit the pad in January 2024. Trucks started toward White Mesa Mill, paused after July 30, 2024 during Navajo Nation talks, then resumed February 12, 2025. This page is the haul — not the regional uranium overview.

The short version

• Kaibab National Forest’s public status page (updated July 23, 2026) states the mine is in production and that Energy Fuels Resources resumed ore hauling on February 12, 2025 after pausing transportation following two shipments on July 30, 2024 for discussions with the Navajo Nation.
• First ore on the pad: Energy Fuels notified the Forest Service on January 8, 2024 that uranium ore had been removed from the mine and placed on the ore pad — the first time ore was removed.
• The mine sits inside Baaj Nwaavjo I’tah Kukveni – Ancestral Footprints of the Grand Canyon National Monument (designated August 8, 2023) as a valid existing right; the monument withdraws future mineral entry but does not shut this existing operation.
• Public advocacy and news sources describe a roughly 300-mile truck haul from the mine area toward Energy Fuels’ White Mesa Mill in Utah, including travel that has crossed Navajo Nation lands — the core of the 2024 pause.
• Grand Canyon Trust reporting has cited company statements of about five haul-truck loads per day with an expected increase toward ten; treat daily counts as operator-reported snapshots, not a Forest Service quota.
• Regional mining history and withdrawal policy stay on uranium mining around the canyon. This page is 2024–2026 haul operations.

From idle shaft to ore on the pad

Forest Service chronology is the clean public spine. Energy Fuels completed sinking the shaft (about 1,470 feet) in 2018. In December 2022 the company began preparatory work — waste rock, connecting the shaft to the ore body, a lined ore pad, a ventilation shaft — ahead of ore removal. Commercial extraction is widely dated to late 2023 / December 2023 in Trust and other public accounts; the Forest Service’s hard notification date for ore on the pad is January 8, 2024.

USGS maintains monitoring wells and regular sampling of soils, water, plants, and wildlife around the site; chemistry of the on-site containment pond is published through ScienceBase. Groundwater pumping volumes appear in state permit self-monitoring and are summarized by Grand Canyon Trust (about 7.9 million gallons in 2024; cumulative figures in the tens of millions of gallons since 2016). Those water facts are the mine’s other logistics stream — water out, ore out.

Havasupai opposition to Canyon/Pinyon Plain is long-standing and public; the site sits in a landscape of documented cultural importance including the Red Butte Traditional Cultural Property as described in conservation-group summaries. This page does not map sacred sites.

The haul pause and the February 2025 restart

The 2024–2026 story that is new relative to older uranium overviews is transportation. Forest Service: Energy Fuels voluntarily paused ore transportation after two shipments on July 30, 2024 to allow discussions with the Navajo Nation about hauling across Nation lands. The Forest Service was not a party to those talks. Hauling resumed February 12, 2025.

That pause is the infrastructure event. A mine can extract ore and still fail as a system if the mill is 300-plus miles away and the legal/political path between them is contested. Navajo Nation law and policy on uranium transport, Arizona state and county concern about highway shipments, and Hopi/community notice issues all sit in the 2024 news record. This dossier does not litigate jurisdiction; it records that the company paused, talked, and restarted.

Grand Canyon Trust has published a dedicated haul-route resource and reported that the company told an interagency group it was sending about five loads per day with an expected rise toward ten on the 300-plus-mile mine-to-mill path. Environment America / Environment Arizona describes trucks leaving forest roads, joining State Route 64, then using I-40 and US 89 / US 160 toward Utah. Repeat: those are published corridor names already in advocacy maps — not a how-to, and not a closed-area access guide.

Production scale versus the highway

Trust analysis of Energy Fuels disclosures puts 2024 Pinyon Plain production on the order of 208,000 pounds of uranium, against a life-of-mine yellowcake expectation around 2.5 million pounds in the company’s technical materials — small relative to Canadian high-grade mines and to annual U.S. utility demand. The point for this page is not energy policy. It is that a relatively small mine still generates a daily truck plant on public highways through towns, forests, and tribal lands.

Kaibab NF continues to post quarterly mine reports (through at least Q2 2026 on the public page) and annual operational radiological monitoring reports. ADEQ holds water- and air-quality permits. Those documents are the official paper trail; they do not, by themselves, settle tribal consent questions about the haul.

What’s actually off-limits (and why)

• Mine site — active industrial operation on national forest; not a visitor attraction. Stay out of fenced/operational areas.
• Sacred and culturally important landscapes — including areas tribes have identified around Red Butte. No routes, no coordinates, no “how to see it.”
• Why the distinction matters: this is a permitted mine and a contested haul, not a ruin to document up close. Watch public highways and public dockets; do not treat the pad or shaft as a field site.

Sources

1. Pinyon Plain Mine (formerly Canyon Uranium Mine) — USDA Forest Service, Kaibab National Forest
2. The U.S. Doesn’t Need Pinyon Plain Mine — Grand Canyon Trust
3. Where does the uranium from Pinyon Plain mine get hauled? — Environment Arizona
4. Arizona Governor Urges Review of Grand Canyon Uranium Mine — Grand Canyon Trust
5. Pinyon Plain Mine water quality permitting — Arizona Department of Environmental Quality
6. Arizona Regulators Are Raising Contaminant Limits for a Uranium Mine With an Arsenic Problem — Inside Climate News

At the meeting of the Little Colorado and Colorado rivers, a painted-looking line in the water is the least useful boundary. The park's boating rule does not follow that line. The fish need the channel, the Navajo Nation has formally protected the confluence under tribal law, and a pretty photograph tells you none of that.

The short version

• The confluence is in Grand Canyon National Park, at the meeting of Marble and Grand Canyons, according to the U.S. Geological Survey.
• The lower Little Colorado is a travertine-building river, not a static turquoise backdrop; floods and mineral dams reshape its bed.
• This is important humpback chub habitat. The fish remains protected under the Endangered Species Act, although its federal classification changed from endangered to threatened in 2021.
• Under the park’s 2026 rules, boats stay out of the Little Colorado channel even where its water seems to mix with the Colorado. Seasonal swimming and wading controls and a confluence camping ban are separate rules.
• In August 2026 the Navajo Nation Council voted unanimously to recognize the confluence, Tooh Ahidiilíní, as a sacred site under Navajo law. Tribal sovereignty and park regulations are different authorities.

Two rivers, one changing channel

USGS places the confluence inside Grand Canyon National Park at the boundary of Marble and Grand Canyons. The lower Little Colorado is fed by perennial water that deposits travertine. Those mineral deposits build dams and cascades, while floods and debris flows move and break material. The place changes even when a visitor’s image of it does not.

A 2021 USGS study compared historical records and channel profiles. In some reaches the bed rose as much as six meters between 1926 and 1992, largely as travertine dams grew. Other reaches cut down as much as ten meters as dams breached; most of those large changes happened before the 1950s. The authors say the later loss of large geomorphic disturbances likely affected humpback chub spawning habitat. That is a research conclusion about habitat, not proof that any one flood raised or lowered a particular year’s fish count.

The dramatic blue-water image also misses a useful point: a river’s appearance is not its management boundary. The park’s compendium says boat travel stays in the Colorado River’s main channel, independently of the visible mixing line. Think channel, not color chart.

The fish behind the fine print

NPS describes the Little Colorado aggregation as the only known humpback chub spawning population in Grand Canyon in its 2015 species account. USGS calls the lower river home to a large population and warns that channel conditions matter for spawning. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service reported more than 12,000 individuals in the Little Colorado and adjoining Colorado River in its 2021 announcement. That is a dated combined-area estimate, not a present-day head count and not “12,000 adults.”

The legal status is easy to garble. Some older NPS and USGS pages, and even explanatory language in the current compendium, say “endangered.” FWS reclassified the fish as threatened in 2021 and explicitly said ESA protection and monitoring would continue. A label changing does not turn the nursery into a swimming pool.

There is a larger engineered backdrop. USGS says closing Glen Canyon Dam in 1963 made the downstream Colorado colder and less turbid. Laboratory experiments found that greater turbidity can make it harder for trout to prey on juvenile native fish; some trials used bonytail as a stand-in because few humpback chub were available. It would be a leap to turn those tank results into a simple rule that muddy water always saves fish in the canyon. See the wider waterline story for a different kind of infrastructure shaping canyon water.

Sovereignty is not a visitor-use footnote

KJZZ reported that the Navajo Nation Council unanimously recognized the confluence as a sacred site during an August 2026 special session. The Diné name reported there is Tooh Ahidiilíní. The report says the site is now subject to the Navajo Nation Cultural Resources Protection Act. KJZZ also describes ancestral ties of Hopi, Zuni, Southern Paiute and Apache peoples to this landscape; that does not authorize a non-tribal writer to speak for any of those governments.

This designation is not the same instrument as an NPS boating or camping regulation. One is an act of a sovereign tribal government; the other is a federal park’s rule for activities within its jurisdiction. Nor does the park’s fish-habitat explanation exhaust why people care about this place. Details of sacred practice are not needed to understand the public legal and environmental stakes.

What’s actually off-limits (and why)

As of September 23, 2026, the June 16, 2026 Superintendent’s Compendium is the source for the park rules summarized here. No boats in the Little Colorado channel. No swimming or wading in the specified southern half during the stated season. Crossing is controlled separately. No camping around the confluence or on its island. These are distinct rules with different scopes, not a claim that every view of the confluence is closed to everyone all year.

NPS explicitly ties the channel and seasonal in-water controls to protecting humpback chub nursery and critical habitat. The compendium also lists a separate cultural-resource closure elsewhere in the river corridor; this page deliberately gives no location details for it. For the broader distinction between a restricted site and a whole canyon supposedly “off-limits,” see what is off-limits.

The practical lesson is refreshingly un-mystical: the blue line is a photograph, the channel is habitat, and the rules are written down. Read the current park rule rather than guessing from water color; respect the Navajo Nation’s decision as an exercise of its own authority, not as a tourist warning sign.

Sources

1. Grand Canyon National Park Superintendent's Compendium, effective June 16, 2026 — National Park Service
2. Historical floods and geomorphic change in the lower Little Colorado River — U.S. Geological Survey, 2021
3. Humpback chub (species account, updated 2015) — National Park Service
4. Humpback chub reclassified from endangered to threatened — U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, 2021
5. Effects of water clarity on humpback chub — U.S. Geological Survey, 2016
6. Navajo Nation Council names confluence a sacred site under tribal law — KJZZ, 2026

The canyon does not end at a park sign. On its eastern side, the Navajo Nation manages land, visitor access, and a tribal park of its own. A national park pass is not a substitute for Navajo permission. Even the line on a federal planning map has a more complicated history than the clean border it appears to draw.

The short version

• The Diné Navajo Nation is both a Grand Canyon National Park neighbor and one of the tribes traditionally associated with the canyon. Those are related but different facts.
• Navajo Parks & Recreation manages the Little Colorado River Gorge Navajo Tribal Park, including public overlooks. Navajo Parks describes it as a tribal park subject to Navajo Nation law.
• The tribal park posts separate overlook admission and backcountry permit terms. A national park pass does not cover its overlooks.
• Navajo Parks says non-Navajo visitors need applicable tribal authorization to enter Navajo land; a park river or backcountry permit does not automatically supply it.
• A 2010 NPS wilderness recommendation records competing Navajo and federal claims about the eastern Marble Canyon boundary. That document is not a final determination of title, and this page does not assert a later resolution.

Two governments, not one oversized park

NPS identifies the Navajo Nation as one of the federally recognized tribes sharing a boundary with Grand Canyon National Park. It also lists the Diné among 11 tribes traditionally associated with the canyon. The first statement is about a present-day jurisdictional neighbor. The second is about a much wider human relationship with the place. Neither makes the Nation an NPS department, and neither makes tribal land a free extension of a park visit.

Navajo Nation Parks & Recreation says it was established by the Navajo Nation Tribal Council in 1957. Its portfolio includes the Little Colorado River Gorge Navajo Tribal Park. That is a government land-management purpose, not a concession tucked inside the federal park.

This distinction matters most when a visitor mentally stitches two landscapes together. The NPS manages Colorado River recreation within the national park under its Colorado River Management Plan. The Navajo Nation sets access terms on Navajo land. The park’s river plan and a tribal authorization address different jurisdictions; carrying one does not turn the other off. For the wider patchwork, see tribal and NPS jurisdiction and infrastructure across jurisdictions.

The boundary has a footnote

The neat line drawn around a national park has two meanings that do not always match: an authorized park boundary and land actually held or claimed by particular governments. In a 2010 wilderness recommendation, NPS described approximately 15,199 acres of Navajo property within the park’s authorized eastern boundary. It said acquisition had not occurred for those lands as of that document. An authorized park boundary, in other words, did not by itself erase Navajo property interests.

That same NPS document described a separate, disputed question about land nearer the Colorado River in Marble Canyon. It recorded the Navajo claim to land from the river to the rim and NPS’s different interpretation of the western reservation boundary. Those are the positions as presented by NPS in 2010, not a tribal statement quoted here and not a court judgment. We did not verify a subsequent settlement. It would be dishonest to draw a new definitive line from an old federal planning report.

There is a practical consequence without offering a do-it-yourself boundary test: don’t use a recreation map, a national park pass, or a federal wilderness proposal as proof that a place is open for entry. Ask the government that manages the land and obtain the permission appropriate to the activity. A border drawn for one administrative purpose is not a universal access permit.

The Little Colorado has its own front desk

The Little Colorado River Gorge Tribal Park is an unusually clear example of the difference between seeing the canyon and entering its backcountry. Navajo Parks advertises public viewpoints and posts an overlook entry fee of $5 per person. Its backcountry permit information lists $25 per person per day, with possible additional fees. Those are posted figures checked September 23, 2026, not a promise that rates will stay put. The tribal park says national park passes are not accepted because it is a Navajo Nation tribal park subject to Navajo Nation law.

Its permits page says hiking or camping in a Navajo Tribal Park requires a backcountry permit and refers to hiking with a guide. Its rules page lists Little Colorado River hiking among activities requiring a backcountry hiking and camping permit. These pages do not make a day-use overlook ticket a license to leave the developed viewing area. They also do not make every part of Navajo land available once a visitor pays a fee. Check current terms with Navajo Parks for the particular activity before going; the park warns that viewpoints can close for weather or emergencies. We have not independently verified their real-time opening status.

This is land with homes and residential areas, not vacant scenery around a pullout. Navajo Parks asks visitors to stay on designated trails, respect residential areas, leave rocks and artifacts alone, and obtain a permit for commercial photography. These are instructions from the government responsible for the place. The department’s larger rule says non-Navajo visitors need an appropriate permit from Navajo Parks or another delegated tribal authority for access to Navajo land. The exact authorization depends on the activity; a generic NPS backcountry permit is not a tribal permit.

What’s actually off-limits (and why)

The broad rule is not “the east side of the canyon is forbidden.” Navajo Parks runs public overlooks. Its published rules also say non-Navajo access beyond authorized uses needs applicable tribal permission; hiking is confined to listed areas with a backcountry permit. The department specifically forbids ascending Navajo Mountain, which it describes as sacred. No sacred place is mapped or explained here beyond the tribe’s own public description.

Nor does an unresolved historic boundary argument grant a visitor a right to pick whichever government’s interpretation is more convenient. The safe distinction is between a published visitor facility, a specifically permitted activity, and land for which you have no authorization. If a trip touches both park and tribal jurisdiction, check both governments’ rules rather than asking one ticket to do two jobs. The neighboring what-is-off-limits dossier covers the broader park-side question.

The genuinely hidden infrastructure here is administrative: tribal park staff, distinct permits, different land-management purposes, and a boundary history that a single colored line cannot explain. Treating Navajo sovereignty as a footnote to an NPS map misses the actual system.

Sources

1. Navajo Tribal Parks / About — Navajo Nation Parks & Recreation
2. Rules & Regulations — Navajo Nation Parks & Recreation
3. Permits — Navajo Nation Parks & Recreation
4. Little Colorado River Gorge Navajo Tribal Park — Navajo Nation Parks & Recreation
5. Associated Tribes — National Park Service
6. Final Wilderness Recommendation (2010), Appendix I — National Park Service
7. Colorado River Management Plan — National Park Service

The National Park Service runs Grand Canyon National Park. It does not run the Grand Canyon. Havasu Canyon belongs to the Havasupai Tribe, a long stretch of the river's south side belongs to the Hualapai, and the eastern rim answers to the Navajo Nation — and in two of those three places, exactly where NPS authority stops and tribal authority starts is still an open legal argument.

The short version

• Eleven tribes have documented ancestral ties to the canyon, but none of them has governing or regulatory authority inside Grand Canyon National Park’s boundary — that authority is NPS’s alone, by federal law.
• The Havasupai are the exception that proves the rule: a 1975 act of Congress returned 185,000 acres to the tribe outright and carved out a 95,000-acre zone inside the park where Havasupai members keep traditional-use rights.
• Where the boundary line itself sits is disputed in two places: the Hualapai say their reservation reaches the middle of the Colorado River; NPS says it stops at the historic high-water mark, on dry land, with no river frontage at all.
• The Navajo Nation makes the same kind of argument on the east side — NPS says the reservation line is the canyon rim, Navajo Nation says it runs down to the river.
• NPS’s own current rulebook enforces the high-water-mark position against the Hualapai today, right now, on paper — this isn’t ancient history, it’s this year’s Superintendent’s Compendium.
• None of this is a National Park Service “closure.” It’s two sovereign governments and a federal agency disagreeing about where one jurisdiction ends and the other begins.

Eleven tribes, one park boundary, no shared authority

Grand Canyon National Park sits inside the ancestral homelands of at least eleven tribes. The Havasupai, Hopi, Hualapai, Navajo Nation, three bands of Southern Paiute, the San Juan Southern Paiute, Zuni, and the Yavapai-Apache all have documented historical or present-day connections to the canyon. That’s the uncontroversial part.

The part that surprises people: none of those eleven tribes has direct management authority or regulatory power inside the park boundary itself. Legal scholarship on the park’s history is blunt about it — whatever the historical and cultural ties, governing authority within Grand Canyon National Park belongs to the National Park Service, full stop. Tribes participate through consultation, cooperative agreements, and joint projects like the park’s Intertribal Working Group (running since 2013, credited with the Desert View Inter-tribal Cultural Heritage Site and the 2022-era renaming of Havasupai Gardens, formerly “Indian Garden”). None of that is the same thing as governing power.

Kaibab National Forest borders the park’s north side; the Navajo Nation borders it on the east. The Hualapai Reservation — nearly a million acres, running roughly 108 miles along the Colorado River toward Lake Mead — sits along its west side. The Kaibab-Paiute Reservation, despite deep cultural ties to the canyon, doesn’t actually touch park boundaries; it’s about 50 miles north on the Arizona Strip.

The Havasupai exception: land back into a park that surrounds it

When Grand Canyon National Park was created in 1919, it completely encircled the small Havasupai Reservation the tribe had been confined to decades earlier — a reservation reduced, after an 1880 executive order, to roughly 500 acres on the canyon floor. The reservation and the trails leading to it weren’t under NPS control, but everything around them was.

That got partially undone in 1975. The Grand Canyon National Park Enlargement Act restored 185,000 acres of plateau land on the canyon rim to direct Havasupai control — one of the larger land restorations to a tribe in U.S. history — and separately designated about 95,300 additional acres inside the park boundary as “Havasupai Use Lands,” where tribal members keep grazing and traditional-use rights under a cooperative arrangement with NPS. The park’s current Superintendent’s Compendium still carries this forward in plain regulatory text: pinyon-nut gathering limits that apply to everyone else don’t apply to Havasupai tribal members inside the Traditional Use Lands, “pursuant to the accommodations made for tribal members in the Grand Canyon Enlargement Act.”

Supai Village and Havasu Canyon itself are simpler than the Use Lands: NPS says outright that they sit “outside the boundary and jurisdiction of Grand Canyon National Park.” The tribe runs it. (More on what that means day-to-day at Havasupai lands and infrastructure.)

Where the line runs on paper isn’t settled on the water: Hualapai

The Hualapai Reservation was established by an executive order President Chester Arthur signed on January 4, 1883, naming the Colorado River as the reservation’s northern boundary. Simple enough — except “the river” doesn’t specify which bank, or which water level.

The tribe reads that language as reaching the river’s midpoint, which would give the Hualapai actual river frontage and a share of authority over the water itself. The federal government’s position, first asserted in 1976 and reaffirmed by a solicitor’s opinion in 1999 during a separate water-rights case, is that the boundary sits at the historic high-water mark — the flood line, well up the bank, on dry ground. Under that reading, during normal river flows the tribe owns land next to the river but not any of the river.

This isn’t settled trivia. The current Grand Canyon Superintendent’s Compendium enforces the high-water-mark position as an active rule today: from River Mile 165 to River Mile 274, the compendium designates the river-left (south) side of the canyon above the historic high-water line as Hualapai Tribal Land, and requires explicit advance tribal approval for any camping or hiking there. NPS is applying its own side of a legal argument that’s never been fully adjudicated. The two sides have been managing the friction rather than resolving it — the park and the tribe now run a joint Colorado River Management Core Team to coordinate river-corridor management even without settling whose line is correct. (The Hualapai side of this — Grand Canyon West, the Skywalk, Diamond Creek Road — gets its own treatment at Hualapai lands along the river.)

Navajo: rim or river?

The Navajo Nation’s roughly 27,000-square-mile reservation runs along the canyon’s east side, with the Colorado River forming a stretch of its western edge between the Little Colorado confluence and Glen Canyon Dam. NPS holds that the reservation boundary follows the South Rim — the canyon’s edge is the line. The Navajo Nation holds that its territory extends down to the river itself.

A 1979 Colorado River Management Plan allowed Navajo Nation members to continue using and occupying land below the rim on the reservation side without resolving which government’s map is legally correct — a pattern that should sound familiar by now. Details on how that plays out day to day are at Navajo Nation lands bordering the canyon.

When jurisdiction meets ambition: the Escalade fight

The clearest illustration of what tribal sovereignty actually means here isn’t a legal dispute with NPS at all — it’s a project NPS couldn’t block. In the 2010s, a private developer proposed the Grand Canyon Escalade: a 1.4-mile tramway plus hotels and retail, dropping visitors from the rim down near the Little Colorado River/Colorado River confluence. The site sat entirely on Navajo Nation trust land, outside Grand Canyon National Park. NPS opposed it. So did the Hopi Tribe, for whom the confluence area carries deep spiritual significance. Neither had the authority to stop it — because it wasn’t their jurisdiction.

What killed Escalade was the Navajo Nation’s own government. A special session of the Navajo Nation Council voted 16-2 against it in October 2017, after the local Bodaway/Gap Chapter — whose land it would have used — voted 55-0 to rescind its earlier approval. The Navajo Nation Council later designated the confluence area, Tooh Ahidiilíní, as a formal Navajo Nation sacred site. The federal government’s opposition was noise. The tribe’s own decision was the outcome.

What’s actually off-limits (and why)

None of the jurisdictional back-and-forth above is a “closure” in the National Park Service sense — there’s no ranger issuing a citation for crossing into Hualapai or Navajo territory the way there is for walking into the fenced Orphan Mine site. What it means in practice is simpler and stranger: two different rulebooks apply depending on which side of an unmarked, sometimes-disputed line you’re standing on. Step across the Havasu Creek/Beaver Creek confluence heading upstream, and NPS regulations stop applying — you’re now expected to pay Havasupai access fees, under Havasupai rules. Camp above the high-water line between River Mile 165 and 274, and you need Hualapai permission, not an NPS backcountry permit. None of it is secret; it’s printed in the current Superintendent’s Compendium. It’s just not the kind of “restricted area” most visitors expect — it’s a boundary between two governments, not a fence around a hazard. For the park’s own inventory of actual physical closures, see What is off-limits at Grand Canyon, and why?

Sources

1. Not Yet America's Best Idea: Law, Inequality, and Grand Canyon National Park — University of Colorado Law Review
2. Grand Canyon National Park Superintendent's Compendium, effective June 16, 2026 — National Park Service
3. Havasupai Tribe Reservation — Grand Canyon National Park, National Park Service
4. S. 1296, Grand Canyon National Park Enlargement Act (93rd Congress) — GovTrack.us
5. Havasupai Reservation — Nature, Culture and History at the Grand Canyon (Grand Canyon Historical Society)
6. Hualapai Reservation — Nature, Culture and History at the Grand Canyon (Grand Canyon Historical Society)
7. Navajo Reservation — Nature, Culture and History at the Grand Canyon (Grand Canyon Historical Society)
8. Hualapai Tribe, National Park Service in dispute — Indianz.com
9. Stopping Grand Canyon Escalade Tramway — Grand Canyon Trust
10. Navajo Nation Protects Little Colorado River Confluence as Sacred Site — Grand Canyon Trust
11. Grand Canyon Intertribal Working Group — Grand Canyon Conservancy